Friday, 31 May 2019

New on Netflix: May 31st, 2019


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of New on Netflix: May 31st, 2019. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Welcome to New on Netflix, a feature here at Wicked Horror in which we provide the latest updates on what’s coming to the streaming service for the week. In recent times, Netflix’s shift in content has been interesting. While many fan-favorite movies and TV shows have been Netflix staples for the better part of a decade, they’ve been taken off the service with more frequency. Some of them return, some of them don’t, and while these are all simply the result of licensing deals that were already in place before these properties even hit the service, they do shed some light on the content provider’s new focus. Netflix is continuing to shift gears away from movies and TV shows owned by other studios or companies and is producing their own content with staggering frequency. As we continue to provide updates on what’s been added to the service, it will always be interesting to note the balance between original and licensed content being added to the Netflix library. With that in mind, here are the latest Netflix additions for the week of May 24th, 2019. Carrie (2013) Carrie is certainly a mixed bag of an adaptation, it for the most part uses the same dialogue and script as the Brian De Palma film, which contradicts its original promise of being closer to the novel. But it’s worth watching for Julianne Moore’s legitimately powerful performance, at least.

The post New on Netflix: May 31st, 2019 appeared first on Wicked Horror.


MA is Middle of the Road Blumhouse Fare [Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of MA is Middle of the Road Blumhouse Fare [Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

MA, pronounced like “Maw” everywhere except Ireland where we say “Maaaah,” is the latest Blumhouse effort looking to scare easily pleased multiplex audiences out of their seats. In keeping with the super-studio’s output to date, it’s scrappy, rough around the edges, and at times surprisingly nasty. Unlike those other efforts, however, it boasts an Oscar-nominated director at its helm and his award-winning leading lady as its villain. Octavia Spencer is the Ma of the title, otherwise known as Sue Ann, a lonely, depressed woman living a humdrum life in suburbia when, as chance would have it, a gaggle of teens convince her to buy them alcohol. Among the group is new girl in town Maggie (Diana Silvers, doing just as well here as in the tonally opposite Booksmart) who’s desperate to fit in but not so naive she doesn’t realise there’s probably a catch. Related: #LIKE is a Thought-Provoking, Sensitively-Played Horror Story for the #MeToo Generation [Review] In fact, Sue Ann is seizing the opportunity, at least ostensibly, for some company and to maybe earn some cool points. As pointless, repetitive flashbacks elaborate, she didn’t have an easy time of it in high school. In particular, Sue Ann was picked on by the cool kids, a couple of whom are parents to the crowd now binge-drinking in her basement. Even Maggie’s own mother (played with real grit by Juliette Lewis) was involved. As blindingly obvious as it seems from the very first time they meet, Sue Ann’s intentions are not pure. And yet, only Maggie seems to sense something is up. The rest of her new pals are perfectly happy to chill out in this middle-aged woman’s basement, greedily hoovering up the shots she provides without bothering to check what’s in them. It’s understandable they’re dumb teens, but this dumb? MA is a strange film, its oddness compounded by the fact it’s simultaneously a low-budget Blumhouse offering and a movie from an esteemed director with an insanely high calibre cast (Missi Pyle! Luke Evans! Allison Janney!) all doing pretty solid work. It takes an annoyingly long time to get to the good stuff, even though Sue Ann shows hints of being a bit loopy right from the outset (she makes Annie Wilkes look subtle in comparison). There’s a sense director Tate Taylor has given his leading lady plenty of room to showcase her (considerable, undeniable) talents but perhaps prevented her from going too crazy with it. Spencer is a master of eliciting empathy, even in her wildest moments, and there’s a shot here that evokes the cruellest prank from Never Been Kissed, but what actually pushed her to the edge was full on sexual assault. Why did it take so long for her to exact revenge if it was so within her grasp? MA saves most of its big shocks for the last thirty minutes or so and, disappointingly, almost all of them are in the trailer. Up until then, it’s the standard jump scares involving Sue Ann popping up and the teens freaking out for about a second before running back to party in her basement again. Maybe it’s the germ of a good idea that wasn’t teased out enough, or maybe it’s Spencer herself holding back, or being held back, but the film never really finds its footing. See Also: Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review] Still, it’s not a complete failure. The humour is spiky and well judged, the performances strong across the board, and there are a few surprises along the way even if the denouement is never in dispute. If nothing else, MA feels like a missed opportunity. And, hell, it’s better than La Llorona even in its dumbest moments. Not a haunted doll or a pair of rosary beads in sight. WICKED RATING: 5/10 Director(s): Tate Taylor Writer(s): Scotty Landes Stars: Octavia Spencer, Juliette Lewis, Luke Evans, Allison Janney, Missi Pyle, Diana Silvers Release date: May 31, 2019 Studio/Production Company: Blumhouse Language: English Run Time: 99 minutes

The post MA is Middle of the Road Blumhouse Fare [Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


10 Years Later, Drag Me to Hell Boasts Brilliant SFX and a Dodgy Premise


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of 10 Years Later, Drag Me to Hell Boasts Brilliant SFX and a Dodgy Premise. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

2009 was kind of a dodgy year for horror (Birdemic! The Friday the 13th remake with stoner Jason! Lesbian Vampire Killers!) but amidst the money-raking studio fare a few gems stood out, not least of which was Sam Raimi fan favorite, Drag Me to Hell. Celebrating its tenth anniversary this week, the flick has aged mostly well, but its seemingly feminist credentials and potentially offensive gypsy stereotypes taste a little sourer in 2019. Further exemplifying that times were different, my DVD copy of the film (purchased from a local rental store that was going out of business at the time) boasts a pull-quote proclaiming the film as “the scariest movie of the decade” according to…Zoo. Those lucky enough to live outside of Europe won’t be familiar with the truly revolting lads mag, thankfully now defunct, but suffice to say it was about boobs, beer, and beating women up. Okay, fine, it wasn’t explicitly about that last one, but the implication was there. Nowadays, a film touted by a lads’ mag as the scariest of the year, even, would be, understandably, avoided at all costs by all those not bearing the initials “MRA” in their Twitter usernames. Back in 2009, however, this was seen as a ringing endorsement for the latest effort from Raimi, he of Evil Dead and Spider-Man fame. Scripting with his brother and frequent collaborator, Ivan, the great man has a lot of fun here doing what he does best. That he would follow Drag Me to Hell up with the scary in an entirely different way Oz the Great and Powerful almost beggars belief. See Also: Why Christine Brown in Drag Me to Hell Deserved Everything She Got SFX maestro Greg Nicotero (who worked on Evil Dead II) handles the yucky stuff, meaning Raimi’s penchant for gross-out, generously oozing body horror is front and center throughout. Drag Me to Hell isn’t necessarily a frightening movie, at least not in the traditional sense, but it’s consistently disgusting and tense. The super strong opening sequence establishes some of the mythology, setting up the idea that there’s something otherworldly lurking in Pasadena aside from Sheldon Cooper and his annoying friends. Whether the personification of a Roma gypsy as an evil entity bent on punishing a white woman is dodgy or not (and it probably is), it’s refreshing to see an elderly woman as the villain rather than the same ol’, same ol’ creepy dude. Early on, antagonist Mrs. Ganush (Lorna Raver) hocks up a disgusting glut of phlegm into a tissue in front of the whole bank, hinting at all the gross bodily fluids she’ll cover poor Christine in by the end of the movie. From bugs to embalming fluid, there’s no end to the gunk flowing out of Ganush. The premise sees Alison Lohman (who will always be McKenna from Tucker to me) as kindly bank worker Christine, who is tasked with proving herself worthy of a promotion over a male colleague by laying down the law with Ganush, looking for another extension on a loan. Christine puts her foot down and is punished for her ambition with a literal curse (she later reveals to boyfriend Clay that she could’ve given Ganush another extension but chose not to). Everybody underestimates her but she also kind of underestimates herself. Much has been made of Drag Me to Hell‘s supposedly feminist credentials, but the message of the movie is tangled up in a lot of dodgy victim-blaming. There’s also the inherent weirdness of Christine being an ex-fat girl, something that’s communicated the very first time we meet her, as she stares longingly through the window of a bakery. Later, she’ll cry while eating a gigantic bucket of ice cream (ah, America). It’s not funny or clever and adds nothing to her character. If anything, it makes her appear pathetic and weak, rather than someone we can get behind. What happens to Christine is actually really unfair, too, and the revelation in the final act that she could’ve helped Mrs. Ganush but chose not to seems to suggest she deserved it. Is she a victim of her own empathy? What’s the message here — don’t fight for the promotion you know you’re entitled to lest you look mean and end up cursed? Maybe, ten years ago, it was enough to just have a female lead, but looking back Drag Me to Hell seems pretty backwards in its representation. At least Christine has a sweet, and consistently supportive boyfriend in the form of Justin Long’s Clay (side note: do more horror, Justin Long — this, Yoga Hosers, and Tusk are simply not enough). Rather than accuse her of being crazy, he sticks by his lady no matter what — even when, during a dinner with his parents (the worst possible moment for a supernatural attack), she gouges a bloody eye out in her cake and freaks. We’re so preconditioned to partners turning when things get rough in horror movies that it feels downright revolutionary that Clay remains a committed, loving boyfriend. Given the prevalence of spooky, area-specific mysticism, it’s worth noting Drag Me to Hell is incredibly strong in this regard, too. Its supernatural weirdness is keenly felt throughout, more so than in the recent, deathly boring Curse of La Llorona, which used it more as set dressing than anything else, while the seance is more tense than anything similar in The Conjuring universe. The demons, whether glimpsed in shadow or fully realized when things start to fly around the room, look considerably better here, too. The seance is the big centerpiece of the movie, but it’s one of several all-timer set-pieces that work even better a decade later. The stapler attack in the car is terrific, and goes on much longer than you remember. Likewise, the lone jump scare in the garage is bloodcurdling, followed up by the gnarly arm-in-the-throat that rightfully formed the basis of much of the movie’s marketing material, and is only slightly let down by the one rubbish moment of CGI splatter in the whole movie. In keeping with Raimi’s general aesthetic, Drag Me to Hell is very rough, tactile, and gruey throughout. Blood is sprayed, chunks of hair are torn out (how does Christine not end up bald?), and the fluids keep flowing right up until the rain-soaked, graveyard-set finale which finds our poor heroine saturated in mud and tussling with a corpse that somehow still wants a piece of her. Watching this movie makes you want to take a shower (albeit not in the same way The Human Centipede, also released in 2009, does). A decade on, it’s difficult to place Drag Me to Hell within the greater horror pantheon, or even Raimi’s work in general. It has all the hallmarks of his movies, including his beloved car, which has shown up in everything from Evil Dead to Spider-Man. The gore comes hard, fast, and gross. It’s not as funny as perhaps it could have been, or was back in 2009. Lohman, who does a great job here, has dropped off the radar in the ensuing years (IMDb lists her last appearance as of 2016). Her performance, with the benefit of hindsight, is more committed than perhaps the material deserved. Related: 25 Years Later, The Crow Still Shreds, Still Broods, and is Still Very Sexy Drag Me to Hell is a weird one to revisit. It’s undoubtedly still a decent watch, powered by some brilliant SFX from Nicotero and a strong hook with a formidable villain we aren’t used to seeing in horror. The supernatural elements are stronger and more well-realized than anything The Conjuring universe has come up with in the past decade. But its premise has aged badly and the punishment of a young woman for her ambition, or her desire to treat other human beings kindly, doesn’t sit well nowadays. That ending now feels like a gut-punch rather than a rug-pull, which tells us all we need to know about the intended message.

The post 10 Years Later, Drag Me to Hell Boasts Brilliant SFX and a Dodgy Premise appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Thursday, 30 May 2019

We Have an Exclusive Set Photo from the Fear Street Movie!


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of We Have an Exclusive Set Photo from the Fear Street Movie!. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

It’s been ages since we got any info about Fear Street, the highly-anticipated movie adaptation of R.L. Stine’s hugely popular novels of the same name, which has been in the works seemingly forever. But now, exclusively for Wicked Horror readers, we have a glimpse at the set, along with several clues about what the premise could be for the upcoming flick. Legendary horror author Stine, whose Fear Street novels are like Goosebumps for grown-ups (I dunno, Goosebumps still seems pretty scary — just me?), confirmed the movie was in pre-production a couple of years back, advising fans producers were waiting for a “good script” and not to get too excited just yet. Then, Collider reported there were actually three movies in the works, rather than just one. The fledgling trilogy will reportedly follow two gay teens who are “trying to navigate their rocky relationship when they’re targeted by the crazy horrors of their small town, Shadyside” (the fictional, and incredibly dodgy-sounding, Ohio town where Stine often set his spooky stories). The lead actresses tapped for the project are Disney alum Kiana Madeira (who also starred in the brilliant Level 16) and Olivia Welch, who’s appeared in plenty of high-profile stuff including Modern Family and Agent Carter. The duo are reportedly playing characters in two different time periods, namely the mid-90s (so hot right now) and the 1600s, a time when gay women were in even more danger than in modern times, leading some to suggest these movies could be adaptations of the Betrayal trilogy. Several writers are tackling the script, including director Leigh Janiak (Honeymoon) and Stranger Things scribe Kate Trefry. There’s no release date as of yet, but the trilogy will supposedly be released in quick succession to each other. Anticipation for the Fear Street adaptation is incredibly high, particularly after the success of 2015’s Jack Black-starring Goosebumps and its lively sequel, 2018’s Haunted Halloween. Stine teased fans on Twitter by suggesting,“The Fear Street movie will be an original story” but you can take guesses from the below photo as to whether he’s telling the truth or not. The shot, submitted anonymously by a Wicked Horror reader, was taken at the North Dekalb Mall in Atlanta. The meaning is, obviously, unclear but certainly suggests an interesting supernatural element is at play here, if not a nod to the infamous Salem Witch Trials (which could connect nicely to modern treatment of LGBTQ people). Check it out for yourself below. We’ll keep you updated on more info as it becomes available.

The post We Have an Exclusive Set Photo from the Fear Street Movie! appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Fantaspoa 2019 Spotlight: Deodato Holocaust is a Top-Notch Horror Doc


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Fantaspoa 2019 Spotlight: Deodato Holocaust is a Top-Notch Horror Doc. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

There’s a scene very early on in Felipe M. Guerra’s Deodato Holocaust in which the cult favorite director behind movies like House on the Edge of the Park and Live Like a Cop, Die Like a Man gleefully sings a ballad, culminating with the chorus — or is it punchline? — “if there’s nothing better to do, go make a movie with Deodato.” The self-deprecating song and dance is a moment of both humor and frustration. After 60 years in the film industry, Ruggero Deodato has certainly earned the right to have his praises sung — even if he’s the one literally singing said praises. Now 80, Ruggero Deodato will almost certainly be remembered as the man behind Cannibal Holocaust, the immortal, hyper-controversial 1980 anthropophagus masterpiece. Unfortunately, he probably won’t get his due respect as a multifaceted, multitalented auteur who helmed scores of exploitation classics for half a century — a potential crime against cinema this standout Fantaspoa 2019 selection looks to rectify. Whereas many horror-centric documentaries tend to focus on the product rather than the producer, the filmmakers behind Deodato Holocaust wisely sought to give viewers a comprehensive look at the career of the Italian B-movie kingpin — from his humble beginnings growing up in a monarchist-loyalist family in post-World War II Italy to his stint as an assistant director for Roberto Rossellini to his big breakthrough directing 1969’s Hercules: Prisoner of Evil all the way up to his fame (and infamy) as one of the world’s foremost degenerate cinema magnates to his two-decade-long retreat into family-friendly television(!) and advertising work to his big comeback flick Ballad in Blood in 2016. Sure, you might be here to mostly get the skinny on the filming of Cannibal Holocaust, but you’ll definitely be entertained by Deodato’s amusing anecdotes on obscurer stuff like Garibaldi (for extra realism, they hired rivaling city gangs that were more than willing to  stab each other on camera for real) and his allegations that the producers of The Concorde … Airport ‘79 tried to literally steal and destroy his print of Concorde Affaire ‘79 to beat them to the box office. Of course, the anchor point of the documentary is indeed Cannibal Holocaust. Here, Deodato explains how the film — and it’s lesser-known predecessor, Last Cannibal World from 1977 — were both inspired by the work of Mondo Cane and Africa Addio director Gualtiero Jacopetti and National Geographic … so much so that certain shots in both films were near-perfect replications of photographs from the esteemed magazine. Deodato says he considered the film to be one big joke at the time of its filming, although going through a divorce, he does acknowledge he was “a little furious” heading into the picture. “Cannibal Holocaust is pure realism — Rossellini would have liked it,” Deodato tells one interviewer. “I saw what I could kill, what was available.” He continues to explain how he convinced the actors in the film to sign one-year “no-compete” contracts to give Cannibal Holocaust a heightened sense of credibility. Of course, that all backfired on Deodato when Italian authorities thought he killed the cast for real to make the movie, which in turn led to the subject of the documentary having to prove the actors were still alive in an infamous Italian court case. Unsurprisingly, Deodato told the documentary filmmakers he wasn’t interested in talking about anybody else’s cannibal movies — “it’s just kill that, kill that, it’s totally different,” he says — although he did say he was envious that Eli Roth got to use a drone when making The Green Inferno. The rest of the film delves into Deodato’s deeper genre cuts, such as Atlantis Interceptors, Body Count and Dial: Help — believe it or not, filmed in the same hotel used in Pretty Woman — which if I’m not mistaken, is the first movie ever made in which a character gets exact changed to death on screen.  But it’s the segment where Deodato gets to wax nostalgic on Cut and Run — an outstanding yet strangely overlooked action-horror gorefest from 1985 that’s pretty much Rambo in Cannibal Holocaust, which was originally supposed to be directed by Wes Craven — that’s the highlight of the documentary. You will have laughs a plenty as Deodato dishes the dirt on Richard Bright (reportedly) showing up drunk for shoots and Willie Aames (allegedly) doing cocaine and destroying his hotel room over and over again. And I’m not even going to spoil the part about Deodato going on a seemingly hopeless mission to recruit Michael Berryman for the picture — that little anecdote is a true gem.  There’s a lot more good stuff in this one, running the gamut from Deodato’s thoughts on The Blair Witch Project to his often depressing recollections of his friendship with David Hess to his philosophical musings on why he thinks it’s OK to slaughter sea turtles on camera — “today’s youth, why are they so sick?,” he says, “they don’t know what death is, they don’t see it, they don’t know it.” All in all, this is a great little recap and retrospective on the life and times of a genre director whose oeuvre certainly deserves more recognition and reverence. To be fair, there are some doldrums here and there but for the most part the documentary blazes along at a smooth and steady pace, never lingering on Deodato’s career pit stops any longer than it should. And come on — how could anybody hate a movie with such lyrical prose as ”the stronger, the more beautiful” and “if you’re going to direct a romance, exaggerate!” WICKED RATING: 8/10 Director(s): Felipe M. Guerra Writer(s): Documentaries don’t have writers! (but yeah, probably Felipe M. Guerra) Stars: Ruggero Deodato as — surprise! — himself Release date: Fantaspoa 2019 Studio/Production Company: Fantaspoa Produçõe, Necrófilos Produções Artísticas Language: Italian/Portuguese/English Run Time: Approximately 74 minutes

The post Fantaspoa 2019 Spotlight: Deodato Holocaust is a Top-Notch Horror Doc appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Wednesday, 29 May 2019

#LIKE is a Thought-Provoking, Sensitively-Played Horror Story for the #MeToo Generation [Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of #LIKE is a Thought-Provoking, Sensitively-Played Horror Story for the #MeToo Generation [Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

The title of #LIKE is slightly misleading, not because the movie doesn’t revolve around Internet usage (it does, at least at first), but because it suggests this is an Unfriended-style scare-fest about online demons. Instead, the debut feature from writer, director, and producer Sarah Pirozek is a smart, ruminative, and quietly affecting little indie. It’s not at all the movie you’re expecting it to be, much to the talented first-timer’s credit. Fellow newcomer Sarah Rich is social media-obsessed teenager Rosie who’s mourning the loss of her little sister, Amelia, who committed suicide a year previous after a lengthy period of online abuse. Pirozek cleverly establishes Rosie and Amelia’s connection via the latter’s now defunct Facebook page and YouTube channel where, Eighth Grade-style, she only had a handful of views per video. Plenty of info is gleaned via Rosie’s late-night social media trawls, foregoing the need for boring exposition from she or her gaggle of similarly online buddies. After spotting a dodgy comment from an old suitor of Amelia’s, Rosie reinstates her accounts and begins interacting with him as her, with a view to luring the dude, To Catch A Predator-style, into a confrontation. She knows he’s local, but that’s about it. See Also: Slaughterhouse Rulez Needs More Pegg and Frost, Less…Everything Else [Review] After heading to the police station, with all her supposed evidence in tow, and being kindly rebuffed by a local officer, Rosie is dismayed her search has turned out to be fruitless. Then, by chance, a local man drops several signals that he might be the culprit. In a desperate move to avenge her sister’s death, Rosie kidnaps this stranger, imprisons him in the basement, and attempts to torture him into confessing to his many alleged misdeeds. #LIKE touts itself as a study of “teen paranoia in the time of #metoo and social media,” and, as haughty a claim as that is, the description isn’t actually that far off. Pirozek’s premise might be outlandish, but the backdrop is all too common and believable. Her leading lady might imprison a man and tell him to shove a dildo up his butt without any real evidence he’s committed a crime, but regardless her story is topical. The setting isn’t realistic necessarily, but the point is made. As Rosie, Rich is an absolute powerhouse. She’s an incredibly strong presence, carrying the entire film on her bony little shoulders. Clearly grieving and unsure how to properly process the loss of her sister, she takes drastic measures, but Rosie is never a one-dimensional revenge-seeker intent on punishing bad men for their transgressions. #LIKE may have certain things in common with Hard Candy, but Rosie is a reluctant instigator. As her captive, Marc Menchaca (Homeland, Ozark) has a grizzly, Dean Ambrose-y air about him. Pirozek wisely keeps the revelation over who he really is until the film’s final moments, and Menchaca cleverly plays his character as neither complete victim nor complete psychopath. There are moments we can be sure he did it, while others he seems like little more than the wrong person in the wrong place at the wrong time. #LIKE would be a far more cowardly film if it delivered the exact payoff we were looking for, and credit must go to Pirozek for sticking the landing in a way that feels both completely unexpected and exactly right for these confusing, frustrating times. Her film plays as a snapshot of everything that women are feeling right now, whether wrong or right. It also doesn’t advocate for the use of torture (so take that, Dick Cheney) or violence as catch-all solutions, tempting as they might be. This is a fascinating tale for the #MeToo era for sure, thought-provoking, realistic and disarming in equal measure. The Internet-based elements are well-done, including a great Fake Facebook and Fake Skype — though with the actual ringing sounds (even Catfish didn’t manage that for a good few seasons). The opening credits are typed out, like they would be on a computer, as they are on MTV’s super-sleuth show, which is a nice touch. The cinematography, from Brian Jackson, is dreamy, summery, and wistful, giving the impression of teens enjoying a never-ending vacation. When the action moves subterranean, he ensures Rich stands out, her blonde hair and often bright white clothes shimmering amid the darkness. This is a very feminine film, with Pirozek’s influence seeping into each frame. It’s a harsh story told delicately and with real feeling. Related: Charlie Says is a Tender and Essentially Female-Focused Take on the Manson Myth [Review] #LIKE is shaggy around the edges, but its overarching message is sensitively communicated and Pirozek is careful not to indict anybody for reacting the way they do under terrible circumstances. She makes the point that the most dangerous creeps are often hiding in plain sight, but that doesn’t mean we should rush to implicate everybody. #LIKE will premiere at the Brooklyn Film Festival June 1st.  WICKED RATING: 7/10 Director(s): Sarah Pirozek Writer(s): Sarah Pirozek Stars: Sarah Rich, Marc Menchaca, Jeff Wincott, Dakota Lustick Release date: June 1, 2019 (Brooklyn Film Festival) Studio/Production Company: DAME WORK Inc. Language: English Run Time: 94 minutes (approx.)

The post #LIKE is a Thought-Provoking, Sensitively-Played Horror Story for the #MeToo Generation [Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Tuesday, 28 May 2019

Blue Velvet Reveals It’s Still a Strange World [Blu-ray Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Blue Velvet Reveals It’s Still a Strange World [Blu-ray Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Criterion has demonstrated once again their appreciation for the devoted film lover. The picture quality in this special edition Blu-ray of David Lynch’s 1986 feature Blue Velvet looks beautiful. In addition, the accompanying special features will satiate any fan of not only Lynch’s feature but also the director himself. Encased in an attractive slipcase representing the ongoing “blue velvet” theme, this Blu-ray is a must have for the Lynchian fan. The perfect companion to Criterion’s 2017 release of the director’s Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me. Blue Velvet encompasses all the major motifs one comes to expect from a film by David Lynch. These motifs are immediately illustrated in the opening shots through idyllic images of small town life complete with blue skies and white-picket fences. True to his style there is, however, always something sinister to be found if one scratches the surface of this seemingly perfect image. The opening sequence ends with a lurking infestation symbolic of all that we try to cover up with pretty things. Again, these themes are prevalent in the majority of Lynch’s work and would be examined at length in his 1990 television series Twin Peaks. The main story follows Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan), a young man visiting his sick father (Jack Harvey). On the way home from a hospital visit, he comes across a human ear in a field. After carrying his unusual discovery to the police department, Jeffrey is given a few details but warned to let the police handle the case. His curiosity is nevertheless peaked and along with the detective’s daughter Sandy (Laura Dern), the two soon find themselves intrigued by the mystery of a local singer named Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini). Related: Twin Peaks: The Return Scores a Perfect 10! This feature by David Lynch is full of uninhibited performances bringing to life an array of bizarre characters. The concept that no one is ever whom they appear to be is both symbolic and physical in this neo-noir mystery. One can never know exactly what he or she will find when peeking into the life of another person. Sometimes, he or she will discover themselves capable of actions they never imagined. In particular, Rossellini and Dennis Hopper deliver memorably raw performances that became etched into the viewer’s mind. On the surface, Blue Velvet (and the majority of work by Lynch) has a misogynistic quality as women are held up as images for the male gaze to be raped and beaten. Rossellini’s Dorothy is not only victimized by the men in her life but even seems to enjoy this behavior. Like the questions posed by Lynch within his films, one has to (attempt) to scratch below the surface to understand what he is trying to say. There are always many layers to everything the director presents to the audience. As one layer after another is stripped away certain revelations occur that shed light on his own worldview. David Lynch is primarily concerned with developing an understanding as to why these terrible things happen in real life. These horrific, sexist images compound many true-life realities. MacLachlan’s Jeffrey postulates “it’s a strange world” and through his character Lynch is trying to gain perspective as to why women are treated in such abhorrent ways. Society places women in these Madonna-Whore dichotomies of being either pure or impure. Lynch takes these stereotypical ideologies and inverts them to show the complexities that run deeper than what we see on the surface. At the same time, he illustrates the horror inflicted upon these women by way of self-shame or harm from men seeking to force them into the cookie-cutter roles society has carved out. From Twin Peaks’ Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee) to Mulholland Drive’s Betty (Naomi Watts), we are shown complex women that are incorrectly categorized by their looks; however, both women suffer at the hands of others and themselves when not conforming to society’s accepted norms. In Blue Velvet, Sandy is the “Madonna” personification while Dorothy is the “Whore.” At least, from the viewpoints of the male characters, and very specifically, the young male Jeffrey. Jeffrey (like Lynch) struggles to understand how Dorothy can in any way enjoy her suffering and goes beyond his own rational impulses to empathize with her male oppressors. He soon learns that she is the truest form of what it means to be a mother. She is a woman that will do anything to reunite with her child. With Sandy, Jeffrey is shown an All-American teenage girl that is willing to adapt her beliefs when presented with new information. She is also intuitive and immensely clever. Considering the temperature of today’s social climate, the themes of Lynch’s Blue Velvet remain as relevant now as they did 30 years ago. Sadly, maybe even more so as three decades later we are still falling short in our treatment of women. Criterion’s Blu-ray release succeeds in presenting the film, itself, as a necessary addition to any fan of horror or David Lynch. The supplements only add to making the purchase worth one’s while. This set is a full mix of documentaries, interviews, and retrospectives. Also See: Twin Peaks Without David Lynch is Like…Cast Speaks Out! Among the special features are two full-length behind-the-scenes documentaries. The first is the 89 minute Blue Velvet Revisited. German filmmaker Peter Braatz joined the cast and crew during the film’s creation. Through photos, audio clips, and Super 8 footage, he captures a rare glimpse of Lynch’s vulnerable optimism right after Dune (1984). Other aspects focus on Lynch’s take regarding the transitioning technology of the time. Those familiar with the director’s recent works can appreciate how he has utilized now what he could only hope for at the time. The second full-length documentary is 2002’s Mysteries of Love. At a runtime of 70 minutes, this addition is more interview-oriented focusing on the cast and crew. Other features include an intimate interview with composer Angelo Badalamenti, an audio excerpt of David Lynch reading about Blue Velvet from his 2018 book Room to Dream, and 53 minutes of deleted scenes and alternate takes. This consists of a majority of footage thought to be lost but now ready for Blue Velvet fans to enjoy. And includes a bombardment of images just as mundane and horrifying as one would expect. These deleted scenes give additional insight into Jeffrey’s voyeuristic nature. There is also a featurette called It’s a Strange World focusing on additional cast and crew. With this new Criterion release of Blue Velvet, the general fan of David Lynch will find much to enjoy, and the hardcore fans will be happier than any “candy-colored clown.” This Blu-ray will be released on Tuesday, May 28th. WICKED RATING: 9/10 Director(s): David Lynch Writer(s): David Lynch Stars: Kyle MacLachlan, Isabella Rossellini, Laura Dern, Dennis Hopper, Hope Lange, Brad Dourif Release: May 28, 2019 Blu-Ray Studio/ Production Co: De Laurentiis Entertainment Group Budget: $6-7 million Language: English Length: 121 minutes Sub-Genre: Neo-noir Mystery

The post Blue Velvet Reveals It’s Still a Strange World [Blu-ray Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Monday, 27 May 2019

Remembering the Gory Brilliance of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Remembering the Gory Brilliance of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

True story: Right before my freshman year of high school, my mom offered to buy me something nice to commemorate the occasion. She offered me a new backpack from Coach (cause that was a thing), a hair straightener to fulfill my emo-fringe fantasies, designer brand makeup, and just anything girly and outrageously priced you could think of. But what did I want? A single issue of a comic called Johnny the Homicidal Maniac. A bloody, rage-filled,  nonsensical comic book following the exploits of a homicidal maniac with a penchant for pessimistic rants and show tunes. Safe to say my mother flat out refused that request, and I spent my first week of high school with fried hair.  But that’s what growing up is all about: buying and experiencing all the things your parents kept from you to “preserve your innocence” (come on, if you grew up anywhere near an Internet connection all that went up in flames with a single Google search). I’m in my early twenties now with the entire comic series sitting on a bookshelf in my living room. I flip through the pages every once in a while and trip on nostalgic memories; Johnny stumbling through his kid neighbor’s window covered in brain matter and blood, the hilarious and half-crazed ramblings of the doughboys, and the desecration of a ‘Taco Hell’ to new-wave goth metal.  Overview of the Madness As the name implies, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac follows the life of a deranged serial killer in his quest for peace of mind,  personal growth, and Cherry Brainfreezies. The series focuses on Johnny, Nny for short, his kid neighbor Todd, and Nny’s numerous supernatural ‘voices’ Nailbunny and the Doughboys, Mr. Eff and D-boy (who may or may not be parodies of a certain canned-biscuit mascot). While Nny’s string of violent murders entrances the series with dark humor, it’s his interactions with these voices and other characters that drive the comic. JTHM is a dark, disturbing comedy with all the trappings for a philosophical thought piece. As Nny rips the brain out of a pedophile’s cranium, he muses on the inherent dangers of innocence. While electrocuting a pair of rude ‘talkers,’ he comments on the evils of social-idleness and passivity in the world. And, my personal favorite, when confronted by a fan/imitator of his work Nny murders this groupie via vivisection and his personal philosophy on self-hatred.   Accompanying the insane antics of Nny are Vasquez’s numerous ‘filler strips.’ These strips take place in the same setting as JTHM and often reference one another throughout the series. While not as violent and gruesome as JTHM, the filler strips are just as humorous, deranged, and disgusting. “Happy Noodle Boy,” one of the first filler strips presented in the series, is a comic within a comic. As Johnny’s personal creation, Vasquez parodies his own comic series and perception as a writer. Happy Noodle Boy, much like Johnny, is a violent, screaming mess with little rhyme or reason to the outside world. “Happy Noodle Boy,” then can be seen as Vasquez’s attempt to satirize his own creation within that creation itself. Vasquez’s meta-writing is also employed in “Wobbly-Headed Boy,” a strip about an adorable, megalomanic bear. Wobbly-Headed Boy, much like Nny, seeks to destroy the happiness of lesser animals. However, this goal leaves him alone and depressed for the entirety of the series. These two filler strips, while occurring in an alternate setting to JTHM, reinforce Vasquez’s satirical and metaphorical approach to his own writings. The other strips, “Public Service Announcement,” “Anne Gwish,” “Meanwhile…,” and “True Tales of Human Drama” all occur within in the same setting as JTHM but underscore the filth and degradation of society. These strips still engage in Vasquez meta-writing but showcase the humor of JTHM to a higher degree. They play with not only the grosser side of the comic’s humor but a darker side as well. One of my personal favorites features a young girl being hoisted and beaten up like a pinata by actual pinatas as revenge. However; the most infamous of these strips is a gem from“Meanwhile,” features a couple on their first date. Adorable, right? Well, it would’ve been if the guy didn’t have explosive diarrhea. At the table. Before we dive deep into the complexities and history of Johhny the Homicidal Maniac, we need some background on the creator Jhonen Vasquez. Vasquez, born and raised in California, began doodling at a very early age. These doodles soon became a regular comic strip in his school newspaper at Mt. Pleasant High School. Titled Johnny the Little Homicidal Maniac, Vasquez authored and illustrated dozens of disturbingly cute (okay, mostly disturbing) precursor comics to his flagship series. As the name suggests, Johnny the Little Homicidal Maniac followed young Johnny’s murderous tendencies. Whether the strip was popular amongst his fellow peers is unknown. However, the school gave Vasquez complete creative control over his dubious content. It’s with this freedom that Vasquez would also create the titular character and comic strip Happy Noodle Boy. Noodle Boy can be described as the antithesis of reason and purpose. Unlike Johnny the Little Homicidal Maniac, Happy Noodle Boy encapsulated stream of conscious ramblings with an angsty teen’s twisted and erratic sense of humor.  Despite the strangeness, his early comics honed Vasquez’s love of comic illustration. These early works established the framework for Vasquez’s later comics: Absurdly dark humor, graphic cartoon violence, and satirical undertones beneath idle suburbia. Vasquez later attended De Anza College at Cupertino, California in 1992. However, Vaquez wouldn’t pursue his college career very long. Rather, Vasquez pursued a career in cartoon illustration outside of formal schooling. It would take three more years and a visit to Alternative Press Expo before Vasquez familiarized himself with Slave Labour Graphics (SLG). SLG is a publishing house known for eccentric and obscure titles. With their love of the weird and independent, Vasquez’s unique style and comic narration fit right into the SLG brand. In 1995, after just meeting and viewing Vasquez’s samples, SLG began publishing the first issue of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac. Art and Themes The appeal of JTHM lies not only in the series’ heavy gore and dark humor, but its unique style. Vasquez was deeply inspired by the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles comics released in 1984 at the height of the black-and-white comic boom. He recalled the grungy, black and white comics as “dirty, imperfect” and atmospheric. Vasquez replicated this grimy atmosphere through harsh linework and highly geometric character design. The geometry of his characters are further highlighted by their outrageous proportions. Characters are often rail-thin, almost stick figure like, to augment the unnaturalness of the series. Their heads, hands, and feet, however, are massive in comparison to express a huge range of cartoony emotions. This harsh linework and sharp geometry are also replicated in the panel borders and speech bubbles. Vasquez ensured that the dark atmosphere wasn’t just conveyed by the character art, but the whole of the comic as well. Jagged panel art and thick lines create a crowded, nearly claustrophobic page. The characters, then, seem to fight not only themselves and the harsh world they live in, but the very confines of their creation. Of course, Vasquez’s detailed border art also plays up his meta-writing and humor. JTHM was often seen as an edgy, dark comic with little substance beyond that. But Vasquez would often use messages within the borders to break the fourth wall, a sort of nod to the audience at the absurdity of Nny’s antics. These messages and the borders by extension propel the dark humor of Vasquez’s work. Satire and Culture Prevalent throughout JTHM, other than the insane amounts of blood, gore, and dismemberment, is the series’ social commentary. The series’ take on capitalism and consumerism is one of the most recognizable. Images and billboards of happy people buying frivolous things offset an atmosphere of a decaying world in the clutches of capitalism. This theme persists throughout all of Vasquez’s work. As an example, in both JTHM and Invader Zim the main characters find themselves hellbent on accomplishing a horrifying goal to only be sidetracked by a grossly humorous cartoon. Just like the rest of society, Nny and Zim become enslaved by media and are thus kept away from their true potential. This potential may be murder and genocide, but the point stands. Accompanying these themes of capitalism and consumerism is isolation. Nny, if you can’t tell, is an utterly lonely character. He has no real friends, and any attempt he makes to engage with the outside world ends in murder. Nny’s interactions with Devi D., a young artist whom he dates briefly, ends in a failed murder attempt. Nny wants to “immortalize the moment” or the feelings he has for Devi,  but he totally incapable of understanding others or himself. Squee, Nny’s next door neighbor, is also an utterly lonely character. He shares many similarities with Nny, like speaking with inanimate objects and anxiety towards new things. Squee, then could be a cautionary tale: Look after your kids or they’ll become raving lunatics with a slaughterhouse in their basement. Gothic culture and subculture are also heavily satirized in JTHM. Nny interacts with (and kills) a number of goth stereotypes throughout the series. They are often depicted as wholly invested in their self-image and their uniqueness from other groups of people. This uniqueness, however, turns to replication within the goth culture. The filler-strip “Anne Gwish” is the most prominent example of this satirization. The strip follows Anne Gwish, a young goth girl who only wants to be misunderstood, invited places to begrudgingly go, and uniquely herself if other people are watching. Like any goth, Anne loves boys in all bands and making fun of people who don’t dress exactly like her. Vasquez often cites Anne as his most “attractive character” only for the fact that he needed some aspect of her to be remotely appealing to readers. Legacy and Spin-Offs His flagship series, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac (JTHM), a recreation of the comic strips Vasquez created in high school, ran from August 1995 to January 1997. Racking up only 7 issues in total, the series left a deep imprint on SLG. As one of the publisher’s most successful comic series, JTHM was a feat in independent publishing. Though official sales for the comic series are not available, Vasquez was able to live solely off the royalties. Along with the success of JTHM, Vasquez also created two spin-off comics and the immensely popular Invader Zim cartoon. Vasquez’s comic series Squee! Featured Nny’s next door neighbor, Squee, as the main character. Though Slave Labour Graphics only published four issues between 1997 and 1998, Squee! caught the attention of Nickelodeon. Producer Marry Harrington found the overall design of Squee marketable to young teens and asked Vasquez for a show pitch. The result was Invader Zim, a cartoon about an inept alien invader hell-bent on planetary domination. Though the series was imbued with the same dark humor and satirical fire as JTHM, Invader Zim wasn’t as gory, horrific, or violent as JTHM. The series ran for two seasons but was ultimately canceled due to poor ratings. But the Invader Zim fandom was insanely strong. A cult following around the TV series persisted well past the show’s cancellation in 2002. After years of demand and urging from the creator, Nickelodeon green-lit an Invader Zim movie to be released the Summer of 2019 on Netflix. Despite JTHM being a short-lived installment for Slave Labour graphics, the effect on culture is evident. This independent comic from Vasquez’s high school years propelled his career in animation. Without the creation of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac Vasquez would’ve never created Squee! and, in turn, Invader Zim would’ve never been picked up by Nickelodeon. And without JTHM, I would’ve never begun seeking out horror-driven, gore centric comics. Amazing titles like Nailbiter, Outcast, and Sons of the Devil would’ve never been a part of my comic collection today. From the art to the humor to the gripping monologues on human degradation and mooses, JTHM is my favorite comic books to this day. And after some digging at your local comic stores, it can find a place on your shelves too.

The post Remembering the Gory Brilliance of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Friday, 24 May 2019

New on Netflix: May 24th, 2019


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of New on Netflix: May 24th, 2019. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Welcome to New on Netflix, a feature here at Wicked Horror in which we provide the latest updates on what’s coming to the streaming service for the week. In recent times, Netflix’s shift in content has been interesting. While many fan-favorite movies and TV shows have been Netflix staples for the better part of a decade, they’ve been taken off the service with more frequency. Some of them return, some of them don’t, and while these are all simply the result of licensing deals that were already in place before these properties even hit the service, they do shed some light on the content provider’s new focus. Netflix is continuing to shift gears away from movies and TV shows owned by other studios or companies and is producing their own content with staggering frequency. As we continue to provide updates on what’s been added to the service, it will always be interesting to note the balance between original and licensed content being added to the Netflix library. With that in mind, here are the latest Netflix additions for the week of May 24th, 2019. Slasher: Solstice  The third season of the TV series slasher has finally hit in the form of a Netflix original. As someone who thought the first season was actually pretty underrated, with each new season offering a different take on the slasher sub-genre and concept, this is exciting news. The new season seems to take things in a different, more extreme direction that should please a lot of fans.

The post New on Netflix: May 24th, 2019 appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Devastation, romance and Satan, oh my! Rob Heydon’s latest feature, Isabelle, has all the elements to make for one hell of a horror flick. Unfortunately, it fails spectacularly at delivering anything horrifying. The flick follows a young couple who appear to have it all: a happy marriage, a new house and a baby on the way. What could go wrong? Quite a bit actually. Tragedy strikes, resulting in the couple being thrown into a whirlwind of paranoia and unexplainable events that may have them steering towards the edge of permanent disaster. Also See: Composer Geoff Zanelli Discusses His Score for The Intruder [Exclusive] I won’t beat around the bush here, sitting this movie out might not be the worst idea. Which is a shame because I really wanted to like it. I tried my best to enjoy Isabelle. Alas despite the great cast, delightfully original concept (huzzah!), a script with conversations that flowed naturally as human interactions should and some interesting special effects, Isabelle turned out subpar and nothing more. Even with an unexpected plot twist! This film’s only saving grace is the performance of Amanda Crew as Larissa. The only hint of anything scary comes in the form of Gregorian chants that played during what was supposed to be the suspenseful scenes.   Overall, Isabelle just feels like a missed opportunity. I watched it twice and each time I walked away feeling frustrated. The scares were predictable, if not a little tacky, which should never be the case if we’re talking about an angry, possibly demonic spirit. I was expecting said spirit to as a bit of a trickster early on in the movie, maybe make some loose reference to Poltergeist or The Amityville Horror. But nothing. At one point we are introduced to a priest who talks of possessions. Seems like a great chance to borrow a page out of The Exorcist’s playbook, right? Doesn’t happen. Just lots of shoulda coulda woulda that makes Isabelle a pretty forgettable film. Regardless of my opinion I’m sure the curious and horror completists will find some reason to give Isabelle a chance. And if you’re willing to waste a couple hours, be my guest. I just guarantee you won’t give it a second watch. Isabelle debuts in theaters and VOD May 24th. Also See: Not Quite Horror: Wind River (2017) Wicked Rating: 4/10 Director(s): Rob HeydonWriter(s):  Donald Martin Starring: Adam Brody, Amanda Crew, Zoe Belkin, and Sheila McCarthy Studio/Production Co: VerticalLanguage: EnglishRun Time: 91 Minutes

The post Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Devastation, romance and Satan, oh my! Rob Heydon’s latest feature, Isabelle, has all the elements to make for one hell of a horror flick. Unfortunately, it fails spectacularly at delivering anything horrifying. The flick follows a young couple who appear to have it all: a happy marriage, a new house and a baby on the way. What could go wrong? Quite a bit actually. Tragedy strikes, resulting in the couple being thrown into a whirlwind of paranoia and unexplainable events that may have them steering towards the edge of permanent disaster. Also See: Composer Geoff Zanelli Discusses His Score for The Intruder [Exclusive] I won’t beat around the bush here, sitting this movie out might not be the worst idea. Which is a shame because I really wanted to like it. I tried my best to enjoy Isabelle. Alas despite the great cast, delightfully original concept (huzzah!), a script with conversations that flowed naturally as human interactions should and some interesting special effects, Isabelle turned out subpar and nothing more. Even with an unexpected plot twist! This film’s only saving grace is the performance of Amanda Crew as Larissa. The only hint of anything scary comes in the form of Gregorian chants that played during what was supposed to be the suspenseful scenes.   Overall, Isabelle just feels like a missed opportunity. I watched it twice and each time I walked away feeling frustrated. The scares were predictable, if not a little tacky, which should never be the case if we’re talking about an angry, possibly demonic spirit. I was expecting said spirit to as a bit of a trickster early on in the movie, maybe make some loose reference to Poltergeist or The Amityville Horror. But nothing. At one point we are introduced to a priest who talks of possessions. Seems like a great chance to borrow a page out of The Exorcist’s playbook, right? Doesn’t happen. Just lots of shoulda coulda woulda that makes Isabelle a pretty forgettable film. Regardless of my opinion I’m sure the curious and horror completists will find some reason to give Isabelle a chance. And if you’re willing to waste a couple hours, be my guest. I just guarantee you won’t give it a second watch. Isabelle debuts in theaters and VOD May 24th.   Also See: Not Quite Horror: Wind River (2017) Wicked Rating: 4/10 Director(s): Rob HeydonWriter(s):  Donald Martin Starring: Adam Brody, Amanda Crew, Zoe Belkin, and Sheila McCarthy Studio/Production Co: VerticalLanguage: EnglishRun Time: 91 Minutes

The post Isabelle Isn’t Worth the Watch [Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Tony Todd Dishes on His Role in the Candyman Remake


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Tony Todd Dishes on His Role in the Candyman Remake. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

The upcoming Candyman remake fills us with both excitement and anxiety. First off, it’s being helmed by Nia DaCosta, whose debut, Little Woods, was a startlingly self-assured calling card. Second, it’s co-written and produced by horror’s new favorite, Jordan Peele. But without Tony Todd as the titular character, is it really a Candyman movie? To be fair, nobody has explicitly confirmed Todd isn’t returning as his most famous character, but no news isn’t necessarily good news when it comes to remakes (just ask Kane Hodder). To date, there isn’t much to go off in relation to this new Candyman in general anyway. All we know thus far is it’s a spiritual sequel to the original, set in present day Chicago, in the now gentrified projects where its predecessor’s story took place. Aquaman villain Yahya Abdul-Mateen II was initially announced as Todd’s successor, but DaCosta clarified those reports in a recent chat with Collider: It’s been slightly misreported. I can’t say what’s happening in the film because we want it to be a surprise, but he’s not replacing Tony Todd. Likewise, speaking to Forbes, Todd himself assured fans there was nothing to worry about, because the project is in the right hands: In Jordan Peele’s case I really like what I’ve seen of his work so far. I have full confidence in that remake being in competent hands and he and I have talked. I can’t say anything further than that, but I think the fans are going to be happy. And now, according to a recent video posted by Sofa King Cool magazine, taken from an interview with the great man at Nickel City Con, there’s even more reason to hope Todd will be involved in the upcoming flick proper. The Horror Icon once again reiterated his support of and love for Peele, noting he was “a little concerned” at first but was happy to receive a phone call from the Get Out director while on location for another movie. Most tantalizingly, Todd teased fans on what to expect from his involvement in the remake: It’s going to be an applause worthy moment… He also, once again, reiterated his undying love of Candyman, noting how “flattering” it is people still care about the movie. Todd also argued that anything that could bring renewed attention to the original could only be a good thing. Check out the full interview below. The plot of the upcoming movie is being kept tightly under wraps, but we do know Teyonah Parris (Chi-Raq, If Beale Street Could Talk) will star, alongside Abdul-Mateen II, as the girlfriend of an art dealer who becomes obsessed with the Candyman legend. Judging by Todd’s recent comments, he might very well be appearing as the entity himself again. The Candyman remake/reboot hits theaters on June 12, 2020. Stay tuned to the site for more info on the movie as the date draws nearer.

The post Tony Todd Dishes on His Role in the Candyman Remake appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Thursday, 23 May 2019

Not Quite Horror: Wind River (2017)


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Not Quite Horror: Wind River (2017). Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Not Quite Horror is back from the dead. After resting for a bit in its kind-of creepy but still-normal-enough-to-pass-as-regular crypt, our biweekly series returns. In each installment, Joey Keogh will argue why a chosen film not generally classified as horror actually exhibits many of the qualities of a great flight flick, and therefore deserves the attention of fans as an example of Not Quite Horror. This week, it’s Taylor Sheridan’s chilly, true-life horror, Wind River.  Similar to the last edition’s chilly ​Hold The Dark, Wind River‘s horrors exist in a harsh landscape that while beautiful also masks their darkness beneath layers of untouched, pure white snow. The directorial debut from wonder-writer Taylor Sheridan (NQH classics Sicario and Hell or High Water), who handles scripting duties here too, naturally, is a stark and frequently stomach-dropping real-world horror story with a sting in its tail that’s impossible to forget. See Also: Not Quite Horror: Hold The Dark The premise, oddly enough, hinges on something of an Avengers reunion as Jeremy Renner (AKA Hawkeye) and Elizabeth Olsen (AKA Scarlet Witch — where is her standalone movie you cowards?) team up to solve a murder on an isolated Native American reservation in Wyoming. Renner is local hard-ass Cory, whose ex-wife is Native American, which gives him a keen understanding of the plight of native peoples. Olsen is Jane Banner, a name only a man could come up with, an FBI agent who turns up without a coat. The Martha Marcy May Marlene star is such a sophisticated, accomplished actress that Jane never feels like a punchline, even when she’s being picked on or underestimated by local law enforcement. Cory isn’t even really supposed to be helping her, but his area knowledge proves indispensable in a climate a Las Vegas-based agent (originally from Florida, where it’s also warm!) has no understanding of. They form a bond but it never so much as flirts with romance, rather they have a grudging respect for each other. DOP Ben Richardson shoots the wide, expansive landscapes lovingly, with a keen eye for how difficult life is out in the wilderness. Similarly to Hold The Dark, there’s a sense that bad things happen here without too much fallout. Who cares when there’s nobody around? Cory is battling against the system as well as his own demons. Likewise, Jane’s city eyes are opened to the struggles of native people whose lives were torn apart by gentrification, and left to fend for themselves. It’s assumed she’s not really there to help, since nobody cares in the first place. Wind River‘s horrors primarily deal with the rape and murder of a young native woman, who made the mistake of falling in love with a white man (The Punisher himself, Jon Bernthal) and paid the price. The film takes a long time getting to the actual crime itself. When it does finally happen, Sheridan doesn’t shy away from the violence or cruelty. He wants us to feel each blow, the helplessness, the lack of care for a human life. The sequence is difficult to watch but not exploitative, focusing instead on this woman’s warrior spirit to stay alive (she ran for miles barefoot in the snow). Likewise, when it’s time to bring her assailants to justice, Sheridan pulls the rug out from under us with a bloody, messy shootout (similar, again, to Hold The Dark though not as protracted). The real punishment comes when Cory brings the worst of the bunch out into the wilderness to deliver some frontier justice of his own. Echoing the sad fate of the murdered woman, he leaves the man to run barefoot through the snow for as long as possible, thereby exemplifying what a fighter his victim was in comparison (The Hateful Eight did something similar, albeit in a more garish manner). Given this is Native American territory, beloved Comanche character actor Gil Bermingham (who also starred in Hell or High Water) plays the murdered woman’s father, a stoic, proud man who paints his face in mourning colors for the film’s final, emotional gut punch. His Martin is a longtime friend of Cory’s who mistrusts Jane at first but soon comes to realize how a woman might play a key role in understanding what his daughter went through. Sheridan makes the point that violence occurs most prominently in those dark corners everybody is turned away from, which are often in plain sight, as seen in Martin’s drug-addicted son. Related: Not Quite Horror: Hell or High Water He ends the film on that final image of Cory and Martin silently looking out over the landscape below, the snow melting as the weather changes. A title card alerts us to the fact there are no records on missing native women, as opposed to virtually every other demographic in America. It’s a fittingly harsh note to end on, but it also gives Wind River a sense of hope, as though things might change for the better it outsiders only took a closer look at what’s really going on out on the fringes of society. Olsen’s Jane Banner dissolves into uncontrollable tears when faced with what happened to the native woman, and it’s hard not to cry with her.

The post Not Quite Horror: Wind River (2017) appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Wednesday, 22 May 2019

Composer Geoff Zanelli Discusses His Score for The Intruder [Exclusive]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Composer Geoff Zanelli Discusses His Score for The Intruder [Exclusive]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

With The Conjuring universe and remakes like It and Pet Sematary dominating the box office, it’s no surprise that studios are trying to ride the horror wave, preempting a resurgence for the genre. The most recent example being Deon Taylor’s horror/thriller The Intruder starring Dennis Quaid as Charlie, a crazed lunatic who can’t let go of his newly sold home. The film, which has been in theaters for several weeks now has raked in $28 million dollars on a production budget of $8 million. One of the most important components of a successful horror film is a chilling score. And The Intruder is no exception, thanks to composer Geoff Zanelli. In the below interview Zanelli discusses his creative process for The Intruder, setting the tone for the film, and much more.  Also See: Tyler Labine Talks Escape Room, The Art of Quipping, and His All-Time Favorite Psychological Thriller! Wicked Horror: What’s interesting about your score for The Intruder is that at the beginning of the film the musical tone is one of hope, showing a couple beginning a new chapter. As things progress throughout the film, so does the score. Did you map out this progression from day one? Geoff Zanelli: That progression is certainly something I had in mind from day one, and I focused on it as the score was being written. I use the word ‘architecture’ to refer to that type of overarching design in the score. And I realize it’s pretentious to use that word! But there’s some merit in it, it really is the grand design and every composer is responsible for that in the movies they write for. It’s one of the things that drew me to film music to begin with, though. It used to be that a band recording an album would keep an eye on the big picture like that, back when the album was king. Nowadays, in the songwriting world, singles are king but in film music, we’re still looking at the big picture because we simply have to. I’m happy you were able to feel the changes in the score as the story evolves, that means it resonated.  Wicked Horror: There is a scene when Charlie is looking at a painting where the tapestry used to be and the audience sees a glimmer of his craziness. When this happens the volume of the score goes way up. Was this your choice or the editors? Geoff Zanelli: I think once Deon Taylor, the director of The Intruder, heard the score I wrote for the scene he decided to play with the idea of all the sound effects and dialogue dropping out to leave just score there, and then it gave him the opportunity to kind of shock the audience back to reality by putting the dialogue and other sounds back in suddenly. That’s one of the ways the film is able to generate some tension even in a scene like that, where it’s just two guys looking at a tapestry. The effect is nice though. You get a glimpse of Charlie Peck’s craziness. Charlie, of course, is Dennis Quaid’s character. Going to just score there really takes you inside his head. That and the camera pushing in on his face makes it personal to him. Wicked Horror: In the film, the house is located in a remote wooded area. As the film progresses the woods almost act as another character with their own, almost threatening theme. How thought out was that? Geoff Zanelli: That’s interesting, I think you do get a sense of the woods as a character, or at least that geography is what enables Charlie to be a voyeur out there and watch Scott and Annie. It’s a smokescreen for him, in other words. I don’t think I consciously worked to make it it’s own character, but since a few important scenes take place out there and those each have bespoke score, it probably helps to create a unique environment. Wicked Horror: Were there any scenes that got cut from the film that you would have liked to see in the final? Geoff Zanelli: Actually, no. Really all of the editing moved the film toward being the best version of the film it could be. Wicked Horror: What instrument did you find made the most menacing sound in the film?  Geoff Zanelli: That’s an interesting question, and difficult to answer! I went out and got a cello, and even though I can’t play it, that didn’t stop me from scratching on it and making the most awful wailing sounds. But I also spent a day at Home Depot, buying up construction material like air ducts and metal sheets, and then bashing them with hammers to become my percussion section. I was thinking since the house is such a character, maybe there was some way of taking little bits of actual houses, doorstops and pipes and metal stuff, and making that part of the score. I was also breathing into a microphone sometimes, or chanting, and then I was taking doorbell sounds and mangling them in my computer to all become part of the score. So it’s hard to pick just one! But hopefully it all adds up to something organic and specific to the film. Even when you hear something you don’t quite recognize, I believe that if it’s related to the film it helps tell the story somehow. So those metal pipes I got from the store, those end up sounding like giant doorbells and the effect is subtle, but those are sounds you only hear in The Intruder. I don’t use them in my other scores. Wicked Horror: There is a scene in the film between two characters who are fighting and struggling over a knife. The score during this scene was very reminiscent of the original Halloween score. Did you get any inspiration from Halloween for this scene? Geoff Zanelli: I can’t say as that was a conscious decision. I’m flattered, though, since Halloween is such a classic of the genre! Wicked Horror: Charlie had a lot of different unique sounds associated with his character. Such as when he is looking at his teeth in the mirror, it sounded like there was multiple voices in his head. What did you do to make those noises? Also, there are a few times when it almost sounded like an animal was breathing over him. Did you do this to show his beastlike nature? Geoff Zanelli: Yes, all those vocals were me, actually. Sometimes you have to do it yourself! You’re right, those are sounds to represent the voices in his head, and his very primal nature. I do what a lot of musicians do and I sing into my phone when I have an idea. Usually the idea is to replace those sounds with other instruments but I kept being led back to this idea of chanting, or vocals, or breathing, or screaming really, because the human voice is really the most potent musical instrument there is. You can do almost anything with it! And I’ll admit that I even tried in some instances to replace those sounds with something else. Like a real music instrument or something… But it never worked, not even a little bit. It kept leading back to the vocal, that primal instinct that just makes everything human, so those sounds stayed in the film. Wicked Horror: A lot of people have been commenting on your score, saying it was almost like another character. Was that the direction you intended from the beginning?  Geoff Zanelli: Oh that’s good to hear! I don’t know if that’s deliberate either, but I always look to make the score specific to whatever story the film is telling, and I think that makes my scores feel unique and, for lack of a better word, attached to the film they are in. You can’t take this score and put it into another thriller and expect it to work, it’s for The Intruder alone. I hope the same can be said of my other scores. That specificity is something I really value in the work I do, and I admire it when I hear it from other composers. Can you imagine the score for Isle of Dogs in another film? Or Images, or Altered States? They’re so specific, and I love when a film and a score are so intimately connected!

The post Composer Geoff Zanelli Discusses His Score for The Intruder [Exclusive] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Tuesday, 21 May 2019

A Beginner’s Guide to Dario Argento


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of A Beginner’s Guide to Dario Argento. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Anyone who is getting into the horror genre has heard the name Dario Argento. For most people, his are not the first movies they see, but he’s often referred to as one of the all time masters, which can make burgeoning fans start to get nervous. He’s one of those guys that anyone who is already a fan of will tell you that you have to familiarize yourself with. But like John Carpenter, George Romero and Wes Craven, he’s a cornerstone of the genre. He’s not as immediately accessible as some of those other masters of horror. But, Italian horror is so important for anyone interested in the cinema of the ‘70s and ‘80s. It’s very different from the structure and tone that fans of American films of that era might be used to. And with this in mind, Argento himself can actually be seen as a gateway, as he is the first Italian horror director that most fans experience. I know his were probably the first Italian horrors I saw before moving on to the likes of Lucio Fulci and Mario Bava. Like those other two maestros, Argento is important because his work has had such a lasting influence on so much of what followed. The giallo horrors were direct precursors to the slashers we all know in love. If you’re already a slasher fan, I can imagine you will love a good giallo. Speaking as a lifelong fan, Dario Argento is one of my favorite directors. Of course his later stuff has been lacking—and thus, for a beginner’s guide, you won’t see much of it here—but his early work remains some of the most impressive in the genre’s long history. Argento is a more thoughtful filmmaker than he’s given credit for. Most of his praise is directed at his amazing visual style, which is unparalleled and unrivaled by any other director in horror history. Beyond the gorgeous use of the frame and the lighting and color spectrum, Argento’s works take on heavy themes including the corruption of the innocent and whether or not violent stories have any impact on real-life acts of violence. Like the best masters of horror, Argento looks at the world around him, sees how scary it is, and translates that to the screen. If you Argento, I also recommend taking a look at some of the great books that have been written about him and his work, including Alan Jones’ Profondo Argento and Maitland McDonagh’s Broken Mirrors, Broken Minds: The Dark Dreams of Dario Argento which is an incredible resource. But that’s for later. We’re taking you back to the very beginning here. Maybe you’ve heard the name, maybe you’ve heard a bit about the kind of filmmaker he is and the sorts of films he’s made. If you’ve heard of Argento, you’ve no doubt heard of his most famous work, and that’s where we’re going to start. Suspiria If you’ve seen any of those countdowns of ‘Best Horror Movies’ that surface around Halloween, you’ve come across Suspiria. It’s well known for its incredible, unmatched visual style, its heavy use of color and the surprisingly gory death sequences paired with said style. Suspiria is the first must-see on the list not only because it’s the most popular, but because it does something that is probably Argento’s most important trademark: It takes scenes of incredible gore and violence and photographs them beautifully, making them all the more disturbing. Suspiria is a great introduction to the director’s work for the uninducted and features an amazing score from the band, Goblin. Tenebre Once you’ve gotten the shiny spectacle of Suspiria out of the way, it’s time to move onto the nitty gritty. Tenebre is a much more straightforward giallo than Suspiria and is not as flashy or colorful. That’s not to say that Tenebre doesn’t have great visual style, though, because it does. It’s shot against a sterile, white backdrop for so much of the feature. So many white walls, people dressed in white, etc. which almost makes the film and everyone in it a canvas to eventually be painted red. In addition to this genius detail, Tenebre has an excellent plot involving an author helping the police track a killer basing his crimes on the writer’s works. Deep Red Many people consider Deep Red to be Argento’s masterpiece. While I consider the above two choices to be superior, it’s still an extremely well crafted film and an important entry. Once you’ve seen Tenebre, you’ll be familiar with both Argento’s giallo structure and his bizarre flourishes of random story details and characters, all of which will make Deep Red a more fulfilling experience if you’re aware of all that, beforehand. It’s an incredibly stylish, impressive slasher. Visually, it’s very much a cross between Suspiria and Tenebre. But much of the intense color here, appropriately enough, comes in shades of red. The best of Argento’s work contains a dreamlike quality, where it doesn’t always follow traditional logic but plays out as if it were a dream. Deep Red is the best example of this, in my mind, containing a fluid narrative with striking visuals but never losing the audience. There are a couple different cuts out there. Most people actually prefer the US cut to the two hour Italian cut, and I’m inclined to agree that it’s probably an easier pill to swallow, although I do like the weird touches of comedy in the Italian version. Opera The only problem with Opera is that you’re going to miss Goblin’s music. Those scores sounded like nothing else and helped to define Argento’s early work. Instead, that score has been replaced with some hardcore rock that you wouldn’t think would fit a giallo about an opera, but manages to be an interesting juxtaposition all the same. This is one of the director’s most well shot productions—which is saying something considering what an excellent job Luciano Tovoli did with Suspiria and Tenebre—and plays like a loose remake of The Phantom of the Opera. There’s a lot of showbiz commentary at work that helps Opera to stand out as a film, as well as an underlying theme of celebrity obsession and voyeurism. In the feature’s most iconic touch, the killer ties up the lead actress and tapes needles underneath her eyes, forcing her to keep her eyes open so that she has to watch everything he does. Inferno While Argento made Suspiria and Inferno back to back, I don’t really recommend that people watch them back to back. There’s a specific visual connection, absolutely. If you were missing the vibrant colors and lavish style of Suspiria, you’ll get all of that in Inferno. But it is nonetheless a very different movie, so I thought it would be more interesting to bookend this beginner’s guide with the first two chapters of the Three Mothers trilogy rather than simply posting them back to back. In many ways, it is even more bizarre and dreamlike than its predecessor. But it’s not made to outdo Suspiria in any way, which I think is its saving grace. The kills are different, the killer operates in a very different manner and the setting is a change from the first but still feels very much in line with everything Suspira established. It might be jarring and possibly even off-putting if it’s the first Argento effort you ever watch, but it’s absolutely worth it once you’ve gotten a bit of Argento experience under your belt. From there, you’re ready to move onto just about anything you want. If you’d still like my recommendation, I’d suggest going back to the director’s first three films, starting with Bird With the Crystal Plumage, which is an excellent art deco thriller. Then, move onto his later stuff if you like, particularly Two Evil Eyes and Jenifer, a Masters of Horror mini-feature he did for Showtime as part of that show’s first season.

The post A Beginner’s Guide to Dario Argento appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Monday, 20 May 2019

The Rabid Dog’s House: Cursed


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of The Rabid Dog’s House: Cursed. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

The Rabid Dog’s House is a recurring feature at Wicked Horror where contributor Justin Steele uncovers hidden gems, lost classics, and overlooked indie offerings. Flying solo or with the occasional guest, he will discuss an array of topics covering film, literature, and television. Check out the latest installment below. In this episode we’re looking back at the underrated werewolf flick, Cursed! Related: The Rabid Dog’s House: Hell Night Starring Christina Ricci and Jesse Eisenberg, 2005’s Cursed follows a brother and sister after being attacked by a werewolf. Another collaboration by director Wes Craven and writer Kevin Williamson, Cursed delves into the werewolf lore while at the same time emphasizes the duo’s whodunit style. Click here for the extended episode, or watch below as Justin and special guest Zena Dixon discuss this underrated gem!

The post The Rabid Dog’s House: Cursed appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Friday, 17 May 2019

New on Netflix: May 17, 2019


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of New on Netflix: May 17, 2019. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Welcome to New on Netflix, a feature here at Wicked Horror in which we provide the latest updates on what’s coming to the streaming service for the week. In recent times, Netflix’s shift in content has been interesting. While many fan-favorite movies and TV shows have been Netflix staples for the better part of a decade, they’ve been taken off the service with more frequency. Some of them return, some of them don’t, and while these are all simply the result of licensing deals that were already in place before these properties even hit the service, they do shed some light on the content provider’s new focus. Netflix is continuing to shift gears away from movies and TV shows owned by other studios or companies and is producing their own content with staggering frequency. As we continue to provide updates on what’s been added to the service, it will always be interesting to note the balance between original and licensed content being added to the Netflix library. With that in mind, here are the latest Netflix additions for the week of May 17th, 2019. The Blackcoat’s Daughter  Oz Perkins’ moody, atmospheric horror The Blackcoat’s Daughter makes its way to Netflix this weekend and this one is definitely worth checking out for those who haven’t seen it already. Featuring the likes of Emma Roberts and Kiernan Shipka, The Blackcoat’s Daughter was one of the most talked about horror films of 2015 and it’s easy to see why, as it’s a solid mix of modern horror with classical gothic influence.

The post New on Netflix: May 17, 2019 appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Slaughterhouse Rulez Needs More Pegg and Frost, Less…Everything Else [Review]


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Slaughterhouse Rulez Needs More Pegg and Frost, Less…Everything Else [Review]. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are a dream team unlike any other, gifting us mirth, merriment, and heart in the likes of Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, all the way back to the still hugely underrated TV series, Spaced. The duo’s partnership with Edgar Wright has proven especially fruitful, and it’s perhaps the great director’s input that’s missing in Slaughterhouse Rulez, the latest Pegg-Frost team-up, and the first offering from their joint production company, Stolen Pictures. First off, if you’re thinking the name “Slaughterhouse” is a joke brainstormed by frustrated pupils bored with lessons, think again. The actual school in the movie is called Slaughterhouse, leading our ostensible hero, Don (charisma vacuum Finn Cole, of Peaky Blinders fame) to ask his mother why he’d want to go there. Good question! If someone invited me to attend Massacre Academy, I reckon I’d probably decline. Especially if, like Don, I looked about 25 and had a midlands accent so pronounced it’s like I’ve wandered off the set of Emmerdale. Still, as his mother enthuses, “they’ve got their own army!” (is that a good thing in England?) and the grounds look pretty sweet (Stowe School, where the movie was filmed, does genuinely seem pretty cool), so what’s the worst that could happen? Well, for one thing, there’s the Draco Malfoy-looking fellow, whose dye job is about as bad as his insults, Don’s insufferably pessimistic roommate (Asa Butterfield, who’s much better in Sex Education, thankfully), and the stories of monsters lurking right beneath their feet. See Also: Charlie Says is a Tender and Essentially Female-Focused Take on the Manson Myth Why, what’s this? It’s Michael Sheen, hamming it up as the principal in a cloak that would make Severus Snape swoon. And here’s Simon Pegg, doing his posh, stick-in-the-mud thing as a lovelorn teacher pining for the girlfriend he should’ve run away with (played by a big-name Aussie actress who quite literally Skypes her performance in — and good for her). Just outside the school-grounds is our old pal Nick Frost, playing an environmental protestor with a big, and very obvious secret connection to the school saved for a final act reveal that adds…nothing (tell us if a character is important, we can handle it). Slaughterhouse Rulez is a disappointingly dull, yet at times totally bizarre little film. I mentioned Harry Potter several times because, in many ways, this movie strives to be like it. There’s the setting — a massive boarding school — the robes, the traditions, the classically trained English thespians doing their bit, and of course the otherworldly elements. What sets it apart from that kids’ fantasy masterpiece is the lack of any charm, wit, or general point of view. Even the school’s backstory isn’t as good as, say, the tale of the fraternity in Neighbors (The Lonely Island makes everything better). To be clear, watching Michael Sheen swanning about the place in a big ol’ cloak while carting around an adorable pup will never not be great (the high council of gayness will see you now), but Slaughterhouse Rulez needs much more of it to make up for the lack of anything else entertaining. The film is so tonally inconsistent, taking in everything from dick jokes to a kid’s suicide, monsters, bullies, a teenage orgy, and even a fracking story-line which, while topical, is completely out of place and woefully underdeveloped, it never manages to hit any of its marks. Who is this movie even for? It can’t be for kids, because there’s tons of swearing and also the aforementioned Dionysian debauchery (which, by the way, involves the most ill-advised joke about fingering this side of Kingsman: The Golden Circle). It’s not technically satire either, because there aren’t nearly enough jokes and, when there are, they have zero payoff or commentary. The screenplay, credited to three(!) different dudes, feels more like a bunch of public school jokes with a movie holding them up. Slaughterhouse Rulez is kind of like Attack The Block but with poshos, except it isn’t even as good as that description would suggest. None of the choices make any sense, from Don’s quip-happy mom, who disappears a third of the way through once he spots a lady he fancies (Hermione Corfield, who killed it in this year’s Rust Creek and is utterly wasted here), to the music cue to The Clash’s “I Fought The Law,” which soundtracks the kids’ arrival on the first day of school — huh? It made more sense when Colin Farrell covered that song in a fake north Dublin accent for Intermission, and that was completely disgraceful. The creature attacks, when they finally happen, are nicely nasty and reasonably well done but the gore is surprisingly minimal and, as usual, the CGI beasties are more effective when barely glimpsed or heard rather than fully realized. It doesn’t help that Cole’s Don is an empty shell of a character, and Butterfield is the most irritating onscreen presence, the kind of kid you’re hoping will perish in the final act because he’s that bloody annoying. Only Corfield emerges unscathed mostly because, as a woman, she’s not given much to do in the first place. Related: Rust Creek is a Ferociously Female Thriller Most frustrating of all, of course, is the fact Slaughterhouse Rulez boasts so little of that Pegg-Frost magic we desperately crave. The two barely appear onscreen together, which is blasphemous for a Pegg-Frost joint produced by their own damn production company. It’s understandable they wanted to cede the attention to the kids but considering not one of the younger lot is likeable aside from the luminous Corfield, surely it would’ve made more sense to involve Frost, Pegg, and even Sheen to a greater extent in order to paper over the increasingly visible cracks. A waste of a lot of great talent, and a waste of your time, should you choose to watch it. Wicked Rating: 4/10 Director(s): Crispian Mills Writer(s): Crispian Mills, Henry Fitzherbert, Luke Passmore Stars: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Michael Sheen, Asa Butterfield, Finn Cole, Hermione Corfield Release date: May 17, 2019 (Digital, select theaters), June 18 (DVD) Studio/Production Company: Stolen Pictures Language: English Run Time: 104 minutes

The post Slaughterhouse Rulez Needs More Pegg and Frost, Less…Everything Else [Review] appeared first on Wicked Horror.


Go Behind The Scenes of the Child’s Play Reboot in This Featurette


Original Source via Wicked Horror

Wicked Horror is the author of Go Behind The Scenes of the Child’s Play Reboot in This Featurette. Wicked Horror is the internet's only horror fan site for free original horror movies, news, review & more.

The Child’s Play reboot is just over a month away but if you just can’t wait those few weeks to see it, fear not, because there’s a new, behind-the-scenes featurette to pore over. If you’re so inclined. It showcases the new doll being brought to life in all its ugly glory. Happy Friday to us all. Chucky will be voiced in this reboot by the legendary Mark Hamill, but we’ve only got a little hint of what he’s bringing to the character in the most recent trailer. Hamill is a legend, having voiced The Joker in Batman: The Animated Series, considered by many fans the ultimate incarnation of the clown prince of crime, so he’s a pretty safe bet. If only his enthusiasm for the movie was infectious. Plainly speaking, it’s difficult to get excited about a Child’s Play reboot that doesn’t include Brad Dourif, Jennifer Tilly, or series creator Don Mancini (who has been very vocally against the upcoming movie, particularly considering he’s working on his own T.V. spinoff). Appearing on the Flickering Myth podcast towards the end of last year, Mancini had some choice words for the so-called reboot and those behind it. He admitted to feeling hurt, particularly considering Chucky is still in pretty good health (something most fans of the series would agree with also). You know, I had just done two movies…forgive me if I sound defensive, [they] were both at 83 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. Even though they didn’t get theatrical releases, they were well regarded. And I did create the character and nurture the franchise for three f*****g decades Mancini revealed he did not sign off on the new film, and moreover both he and producer David Kirschner refused to executive produce it themselves, when asked. We have our ongoing thriving business with Chucky… The producers of that movie are the producers of It. How would they feel if there was some legal loophole that allowed David Kirschner and I to swoop in and make our own It movie with our own version of Pennywise and say, ‘Hey guys, we would love to put your names on it?’ I imagine they wouldn’t like it Mancini went on to explain that it’s not about the money, but rather how personal Chucky is to him, and how Child’s Play 2019 might negatively affect his ability to revisit the killer doll on the big screen in future. Echoing his sentiments, the legendary Tilly, who features in the movies both as herself as well as voicing Chucky’s paramour Tiffany, took to Twitter to express her displeasure. From Orion Pictures, Child’s Play 2019 is billed as a “contemporary re-imagining” of the original film, whatever the hell that means. It follows Aubrey Plaza’s single mother, who gifts her young son (played by Gabriel Bateman) a Buddi doll, which is basically an A.I. toy with murderous intentions. So, no voodoo, no serial killer soul, no Chucky essentially. The flick is directed by Norwegian filmmaker Lars Klevberg (Polaroid) from a script by Tyler Burton Smith. Bryan Tyree Henry co-stars. Child’s Play 2019 boasts some heavy-hitter producers too, in the form of Seth Grahame-Smith and David Katzenberg, who produced the brilliant IT movie adaptation, the second part of which drops later this year. Child’s Play 2019 hits theaters on June 21, 2019. Check out the behind-the-scenes featurette below, starring Henry, director Klevberg, and the incredibly ugly new Chucky doll.

The post Go Behind The Scenes of the Child’s Play Reboot in This Featurette appeared first on Wicked Horror.